- Deeply Flawed U.S. Climate Action Partnership Proposal
Deeply Flawed U.S. Climate Action Partnership Proposal
Your contribution will benefit Friends of the Earth.
Thanks for your interest in Friends of the Earth. You can find information about us and get in touch the following ways:
Friends of the Earth released a statement regarding the deeply flawed U.S. Climate Action Partnership (U.S. CAP) Proposal. U.S. CAP’s proposed emissions reduction target for the year 2020 is far weaker than what scientists have called for, the proposal calls for the use of carbon offset loopholes and goes against Obama’s push for 100% auctions. While it’s encouraging to see corporations involved in the climate debate, this proposal goes nowhere near where successful climate legislation should be.
Some of Friends of the Earth’s critiques of the proposal:
• U.S. CAP’s proposed 14-20 percent emissions reduction target (below 2005 levels) for the year 2020 is far weaker than what scientists have called for. In a memo to the Obama transition team, U.S. environmental community leaders recently called for U.S. reductions of at least 35 percent by 2020. And even this U.S. environmental community call is at the low end of the range of reductions that the world’s leading panel of climate scientists, the Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, has called for.
• U.S. CAP wants to include the use of carbon offset loopholes in climate legislation. Unfortunately, offsets can allow U.S. corporate polluters to continue producing more than their fair share of greenhouse gas emissions, and it is nearly impossible to verify that such offsets, especially on the international market, end up producing the intended emissions reductions elsewhere.
• The U.S. CAP proposal calls for “a significant portion” of emission permits to be given away to industry for free, which would total hundreds of billions of dollars worth of polluter giveaways. This stands in contrast to President-elect Obama’s call for a 100 percent auction of such permits that would obligate corporate polluters to pay for their emissions. A 100 percent auction would also generate revenue to fight global warming and assist the public. The U.S. CAP proposal also calls for other massive giveaways to polluting industries, including coal.
• U.S. CAP would allow coal-fired power plants using current technology to be built for at least another seven years, potentially locking in new pollution for decades to come. Coal is the dirtiest energy source there is, and causes the most greenhouse gas emissions. Top NASA scientist James Hansen has called for an immediate ban on construction of new coal-fired power plants with current technology, and for a quick phase-out of such plants that already exist. Any effective U.S. climate policy must prevent such new coal plants from being built.